While future revelations about the
culprits in the blasts that killed 17 people Wednesday could still
sabotage relations between the countries, the Indian government so far
has rejected opposition demands for a heavy response against Pakistan.
On
Friday, India said it was working out dates for the next round of
negotiations expected this month between top officials from both
countries. India doesn't let blasts derail Pakistan talks “The talks
with Pakistan are on schedule,” foreign ministry spokesman Vishnu
Prakash said.
Pakistan’s
leaders had quickly condemned the blasts and have welcomed India’s
measured response. In a statement Friday, Prime Minister Yousuf Raza
Gilani “expressed satisfaction at the resolve of both Pakistan and India
to continue with their bilateral dialogue, and not get deterred by
terrorists’ designs to derail the dialogue once again.”
The
coordinated triple bombings were the worst terror attack in India since
10 Pakistan-based militants rampaged through the city in November 2008,
killing 166 people.
Investigators
examined forensic evidence and footage from closed circuit cameras
Friday for clues about who orchestrated the blasts. “People are being
questioned on the basis of our previous database and known linkages. We
also have identified the scooter in which one of the bombs was planted,”
India’s Home Secretary R.K. Singh told reporters in New Delhi.
He
also said investigators had intercepted an email sent from outside
Mumbai but declined to give details. Intelligence analysts say the
attack bore the hallmarks of the Indian Mujahideen, a shadowy Islamic
militant group.
A
former top Indian intelligence official told The Associated Press that
Pakistan’s Lashkar-e-Taiba militant group has been providing ideological
and physical training to the Indian Mujahedeen since 2004. Leaders of
the Hindu nationalist Bharatiya Janata Party strongly criticized the
government of Prime Minister Manmohan Singh for not taking a harder line
with Pakistan.
“Manmohan
Singh, sir, what is the nature of your relationship with Pakistan?” BJP
spokesman Ravi Shankar Prasad asked angrily at a news conference
Friday. Government officials have refused to take the bait. Home
Minister Palaniappan Chidambaram said Thursday that investigators were
not ruling out the possibility the attacks were aimed at scuttling the
talks.
G.
Parthasarthy, a former Indian ambassador to Pakistan, said it would
have been counterproductive for the government to overreact, especially
on something as important as peace talks, before a culprit was named.
“If concrete proof emerges, I have no idea what the government will do,”
he said.
The
talks, though unlikely to produce concrete results because of political
weakness on both sides, at least will lower the temperature between the
nations, said Ashok Mehta, a retired Indian army general and leading
strategic analyst.
“They’ve tried both talking and not talking, and the experience has been that talking is the most viable option,” he said.
In
addition, cutting off talks would be a politically damaging admission
of failure for Singh, who is already fighting off a raft of corruption
allegations against his government.
“The
prime minister has staked his reputation and his political fortune on
being able to change Pakistan’s behavior and get them to live as
peaceful and friendly neighbors,” Mehta said.
India
and Pakistan, nuclear powers that have fought three wars since
independence in 1947, had been engaged in reportedly fruitful
negotiations before the Mumbai siege nearly three years ago.
India
quickly broke off the peace talks, demanding Pakistan crack down on
those accused in the attack, including Lashkar-e-Taiba. Last month, a
Pakistani-American testified in a trial in Chicago that Pakistani
intelligence was directly involved in plotting and funding the Mumbai
siege, a charge denied by Islamabad.
Though
India remained unsatisfied with Islamabad’s tepid effort to bring those
responsible for the attack to justice, the two countries decided in
February to restart a full-fledged peace process and have since held
talks about the disputed region of Kashmir and the continuing threat
posed by terrorism.
Pakistani
political analyst Khaled Mahmood said India has in the past been quick
to suspend talks or consider military options, but that they “didn’t
gain anything out of it.”
This
time, “the government’s approach has been more mature,” he said. “It’s a
good development. The process is already on. If this would be
interrupted, then it would take a lot of time and effort to resume it.”
But Parthasarthy, the former ambassador to Pakistan, said India’s
patience has limits.
“Tensions
will flare if there is one more terrorist attack,” he said. “I don’t
think next time around our response will be as Gandhian as it was in the
past.”
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar